[kuestentanne]

Geht ja auch nicht mehr. Nach 8 Jahren ist der Kram verjährt.
Davon könnte auch Lance noch von profitieren.

Und für Ulle hat sich die lange Verfahrenszeit schließlich noch gelohnt.

Da 2009 die Regelung für Amphetamine geändert wurde, greift http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lex_mitior und er gilt nicht als Wiederholungstäter und deshalb auch nur 2 Jahre und nicht lebenslänglich.

79. According to Article 314 of the UCI Rules, where there has been no acceptance or
acknowledgement of an athlete’s culpability, periods of ineligibility are set to run
from the date of a hearing in an antidoping case. The first instance hearing took place
in 2009/2010. As a result, the question is whether this first instance hearing is the one
from which the period of ineligibility is set to run. The Panel finds this not
appropriate, since the first instance panel did not look at the merits of the case but
dismissed the case for lack of competence. This Panel, however, is of the view that –
in principle – the period of ineligibility should only start to run from such hearing date
on which a first instance panel looked into the substance of the alleged doping
offence. This hearing date is the one that took place on 22 August, 2011 (see para. 18,
above). In view of Article 314 of the UCI Rules, the Panel has decided to start the
period of ineligibility on 22 August 2011.

Und hier der Grund für die Sperre ab 2011.