Zitat:
Zitat von NBer
öööööhm, habe den fall jetzt nicht detailliert mitverfolgt, aber hat sie nicht medizinische koryphäen und sogar anerkannte dopingjäger wie franke aufmarschieren lassen, sich von ihnen untersuchen lassen usw? was hätte sie deiner meinung nach noch machen sollen?
|
Das war jetzt Satire, oder?
Man erinnere sich an das Urteil der ISU:
(…) Because the only possibility to prove a congenital blood disease is by way of an examination of the individual, for which the ISU has no authority, Complainant in its Statement of Reply correctly stated that it is for the Alleged Offender to prove any congenital blood disease by undergoing medical examination. In light of this the Panel was surprised to learn from the Reply of the Alleged Offender of June 18, 2009, page 20 and from the testimony of Dr. Lutz at the oral hearing that until one week before the hearing there was no attempt by the Alleged Offender to medically determine whether she carries a blood disease.
(…) After a private consultation between the Alleged Offender, the Interested ISU Member and the support personnel the Alleged Offender announced to the Panel that she did not accept the offer of time but instead requested a decision to be made on the evidence as it exists at the end of the hearing.
(...) Given that the Alleged Offender refused to furnish to the Panel the only evidence possible to prove the only reasonably possible alternative cause for her blood profile other than blood doping, thereby depriving the Complainant of the only possibility to eliminate this alternative cause, the Panel considers that it cannot take this possible altemative cause into consideration. (…)