[suze]

Dem wird in einem Artikel von 02/2013 widersprochen:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3576706/

"As we have seen, the hypothesis that LF/HF quantifies “sympatho-vagal balance” depends upon four interrelated assumptions, all of which can be proven to be false. The facts are in direct opposition to the assumptions. In particular, the complex nature of LF power, its exceedingly poor relationship to sympathetic nerve activation, and the non-linear (and often non-reciprocal) interactions between sympathetic and parasympathetic nerve activity that are confounded by the mechanical effects of respiration and prevailing heart rate, make it impossible to delineate the physiological basis for LF/HF with any degree of certainty. Thus, the LF/HF sympatho-vagal balance hypothesis has been disproven—the preponderance of evidence confirms that LF/HF data cannot accurately quantify cardiac “sympatho-vagal balance” either in health or disease."

Der rmssd-Wert ist da sicherlich aussagekräftiger.

Auch hier hilft wahrscheinlich nur eine längere, statistische Auswertung der persönlichen Werte, um Tendenzen in Bezug auf Belastung/Entlastung/Tapering zu erkennen. Die Frage ist, ob das noch was bringt, wenn man die beiden Werte(rmssd, lf/hf) miteinander vermischt?
Grüße!