Joersch
03.03.2011, 00:18
...habe den Link eben von einem Freund bekommen...
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/18/health/nutrition/18best.html?pagewanted=2
Titel: Close Look at Orthotics Raises a Welter of Doubts
...
“Since we don’t do that anymore, we don’t really need an arch,” he wrote in an e-mail. “Why would we? For landing — no need. For the stance phase — no need. For the takeoff phase — no need. Thus a flat foot is not something that is bad per se.”
So why shouldn’t Jason — or anyone, for that matter — just go to a store and buy whatever shoe feels good, without worrying about “correcting” a perceived biomechanical defect?
“That is exactly what you should do,” Dr. Nigg replied.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/18/health/nutrition/18best.html?pagewanted=2
Titel: Close Look at Orthotics Raises a Welter of Doubts
...
“Since we don’t do that anymore, we don’t really need an arch,” he wrote in an e-mail. “Why would we? For landing — no need. For the stance phase — no need. For the takeoff phase — no need. Thus a flat foot is not something that is bad per se.”
So why shouldn’t Jason — or anyone, for that matter — just go to a store and buy whatever shoe feels good, without worrying about “correcting” a perceived biomechanical defect?
“That is exactly what you should do,” Dr. Nigg replied.