Flow
26.02.2013, 11:34
Die Veganer-Mafia reitet weiter. Nach der leckeren Lasagne und den glücklichen Eiern, ist nun der Fisch unter großangelegtem Beschuß.
Wir haben hier eine Studie vorliegen (http://oceana.org/sites/default/files/reports/National_Seafood_Fraud_Testing_Results_FINAL.pdf), welche in US-amerikanischen Restaurants und Einzelhandel angebotenen Fisch näher unter die Lupe nimmt.
From 2010 to 2012, Oceana conducted one of the largest seafood fraud investigations in the world to date, collecting more than 1,200 seafood samples from 674 retail outlets in 21 states to determine if they were honestly labeled. DNA testing found that one-third (33 percent) of the 1,215 samples analyzed nationwide were mislabeled, according to U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines.
Ein stolzes Drittel des angebotenen Fischs war falsch etikettiert, bzw. wurde als etwas anderes angeboten, als es tatsächlich war.
Of the most commonly collected fish types, samples sold as snapper and tuna had the highest mislabeling rates (87 and 59 percent, respectively), with the majority of the samples identified by DNA analysis as something other than what was found on the label. In fact, only seven of the 120 samples of red snapper purchased nationwide were actually red snapper. The other 113 samples were another fish. Halibut, grouper, cod and Chilean seabass were also mislabeled between 19 and 38 percent of the time, while salmon was mislabeled 7 percent of the time.
59% des angebotenen Thunfischs war kein Thunfisch.
87% des Snappers war kein Snapper.
Von der als "Red Snapper" erworbenen Ware war nichtmal 6% tatsächlich Red Snapper.
Mund auf, Augen zu ... :cool:
Wir haben hier eine Studie vorliegen (http://oceana.org/sites/default/files/reports/National_Seafood_Fraud_Testing_Results_FINAL.pdf), welche in US-amerikanischen Restaurants und Einzelhandel angebotenen Fisch näher unter die Lupe nimmt.
From 2010 to 2012, Oceana conducted one of the largest seafood fraud investigations in the world to date, collecting more than 1,200 seafood samples from 674 retail outlets in 21 states to determine if they were honestly labeled. DNA testing found that one-third (33 percent) of the 1,215 samples analyzed nationwide were mislabeled, according to U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines.
Ein stolzes Drittel des angebotenen Fischs war falsch etikettiert, bzw. wurde als etwas anderes angeboten, als es tatsächlich war.
Of the most commonly collected fish types, samples sold as snapper and tuna had the highest mislabeling rates (87 and 59 percent, respectively), with the majority of the samples identified by DNA analysis as something other than what was found on the label. In fact, only seven of the 120 samples of red snapper purchased nationwide were actually red snapper. The other 113 samples were another fish. Halibut, grouper, cod and Chilean seabass were also mislabeled between 19 and 38 percent of the time, while salmon was mislabeled 7 percent of the time.
59% des angebotenen Thunfischs war kein Thunfisch.
87% des Snappers war kein Snapper.
Von der als "Red Snapper" erworbenen Ware war nichtmal 6% tatsächlich Red Snapper.
Mund auf, Augen zu ... :cool: